A discussion on the role of john adams in the boston massacre

Quotes[ edit ] Metaphysicians and politicians may dispute foreverbut they will never find any other moral principle or foundation of rule or obedience, than the consent of governors and governed. Fear is the foundation of most governments; but it is so sordid and brutal a passion, and renders men in whose breasts it predominates so stupid and miserable. Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishesour inclinations, or the dictates of our passionthey cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.

A discussion on the role of john adams in the boston massacre

If found guilty they could face the death penalty. Preston and his soldiers could not find a legal representative counsel, they approached several lawyers without success until year old John Adams agreed to head their defense.

But why did John Adams and Josiah Quincy agree to take on the defense of men who had killed five Boston residents? This was an unpopular assignment, one that could have adversely affected his reputation and future income.

While he strongly believed that all men were entitled to a fair trial and that they deserved equal justice, he knew of the dangers to his practice and of the violence that the mob was capable therefore endangering his wife and young children. On the other hand, in the long term, he might be remembered as a man who put law above his personal beliefs.

According to historian Hiller B. Defense and prosecution teams The defense team was headed by John Adams who was assisted mainly by Josiah Quincy who was the younger brother of prosecutor Samuel Quincy. Josiah Quincy became the main spokesman for the Boston chapter of the Sons of Liberty before the revolution.

Completing the team were Sampson Salter Blowers, a noted lawyer and jurist, and Robert Auchmuty, a judge of the Vice-Admiralty Court who agreed to serve on the condition that John Adams be co-counsel. The counsel for the prosecution was headed by Samuel Quincy.

Thomas Preston and the eight soldiers were to be tried separately according to the magistrate. The trial of Thomas Preston The trials did not take place immediately. Thomas Gage, the commander of British troops in America, urged Thomas Hutchinson to delay the trials until feelings for the murders had cooled down.

It was approved for printing by order of the Town of Boston and was intended mostly for circulation in England. This image was printed in the Boston Gazette and was publicly distributed furthering public outrage. A six-day trial for a murder case was considered extremely long back then.

A discussion on the role of john adams in the boston massacre

Preston pleaded not guilty but did not testify. The plan of the defense was to prove that Preston had not ordered the shooting. The prosecution called fifteen witnesses to prove that Preston had ordered his men to shoot but on cross examination their testimony appeared contradictory.

The defense produced twenty three witnesses who testified that soldiers were intimidated and provoked by the crowd.

The court took the unusual step of sequestering the jury keep them away from family and friends. The names of the soldiers were: Their defense was complicated by the acquittal of Thomas Preston since the jurors would be inclined to believe the soldiers were responsible for the shootings.

He made clear that the soldiers were endangered and they had the right to fire in self-defense and that at most they were guilty of manslaughter and not of murder. An important circumstance in the trial was the second hand testimony of Patrick Carr, a wounded victim of the the incident who testified from his death bed.

According to the physician, Carr admitted that the soldiers were provoked and fired in self defense and that he did not blame the soldier who shot him.

The prosecution concentrated on showing that soldiers wanted revenge after many months of being abused and harrassed by townspeople. The jury acquitted six of the soldiers: The other two soldiers, Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Killroy, were found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter, therefore escaping the death penalty.

Early life

On December 13th, the four civilians who were accused of firing from the customs house were tried. All four were acquitted as the only defense witness presented a false testimony.

The witness was convicted of perjury.There are some truths that I strive to preach, for lack of a better word, in today's information-culture wars propagated in our corrupt mainstream media.

By Maria Saporta. Back during the Civil War, the land that is now known as the Bobby Jones Golf Course was a battlefield that witnessed one of the bloodiest battles of the Atlanta Campaign. Current Events.

A discussion on the role of john adams in the boston massacre

Collection of thoughts and discussions on today’s current events and how ‘A World Deceived’ helps to explain and examine them. The Boston Massacre, known as the Incident on King Street by the British, was a confrontation on March 5, , in which British Army soldiers shot and killed five people while under harassment by locals.

The incident was heavily publicized by leading Patriots, such as Paul Revere and Samuel Adams, to encourage rebellion against the British authorities. John Adams (October 30 [O.S. October 19] – July 4, ) was one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, serving as the first Vice President (–) and as the second President of the United States (–).

He was a lawyer, diplomat, and leader of American independence from Great srmvision.com was a dedicated diarist, and correspondent with his wife and advisor Abigail. Watch breaking news videos, viral videos and original video clips on srmvision.com

Current Events Discussion - A World Deceived